PRO vs CON with periodic analysis checkpoints and dynamic restrictions to prevent loops and keep long debates coherent.
PRO and CON agents debate a topic over many turns with Ollama-compatible models.
A summarizer analyzes the transcript periodically and injects restrictions to cut repetition and stalemates.
Can end the debate early on agreement, total refutation, or clear concession.
PRO and CON alternate responses with controlled conversation memory.
The summarizer extracts arguments, refutations, and exhausted topics.
Prompts are updated to avoid repetitive lines and force novelty.
Can end the debate when there is agreement or a clear winner.
Real CLI outputs available in the docs/ folder.
Loading…
Tip: you can open the raw file too: 225.txt